<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Article Authoring DTD v1.4 20240229//EN" "JATS-articleauthoring1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xml:lang="zh-CN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">6</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>国际教育学</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn>ISSN:2972-4171</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>华文科学出版社</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12421/gjjyx20241001007</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">3251</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Critical Response to Two Articles about Sibship Size</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Xuan Wu</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <year>2024</year>
        <month>10</month>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper examines the impact of sibling size on children's intellectual development and academic
achievement through a critical analysis of two opposing theories：Resource Dilution Theory and the Confluence
Model. Downey's article supports Resource Dilution Theory，highlighting the negative consequences of larger
families on educational outcomes due to resource dilution. Phillips' article critiques Guo and VanWey's
research，which challenges resource dilution theory and argues for the importance of parental investment and
individual differences. The paper concludes by emphasising the need for further research that takes into account
these factors and the complexity of the relationship between sibling size and educational outcomes.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
</article>
